Current:Home > ContactWisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal -Capital Dream Guides
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
View
Date:2025-04-15 04:04:35
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Mega Millions winning numbers for June 28 drawing: Jackpot rises to $137 million
- NY police shoot and kill 13-year-old boy in Utica. Protests erupt at city hall
- T.I. & Tiny’s Daughter Heiress Adorably Steals the Show at 2024 BET Awards
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Looking forward and back as the Civil Rights Act turns 60
- Taylor Swift plays song for eighth time during acoustic set in Dublin
- Taylor Swift tells staff 'We need some help' for fan at Ireland Eras Tour show
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Delaware lawmakers cap budget work with passage of record grants package for local organizations
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- Alec Baldwin headed to trial after judge rejects motion to dismiss charge
- Tia Mowry's Ex-Husband Cory Hardrict Shares How He's Doing After Divorce
- 4 dead, 9 injured after a car crashes into a Long Island nail salon; driver arrested
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- AEW Forbidden Door 2024 live: Results, match grades, highlights and more
- Pac-12 Networks to go dark Sunday night after 12-year run
- The Latest | Polls are open in France’s early legislative election
Recommendation
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
Major brands scaled back Pride Month campaigns in 2024. Here's why that matters.
US Track & Field Olympic trials live updates: Noah Lyles, Gabby Thomas win 200 finals
Despite indefinite landing delay, NASA insists Boeing Starliner crew not stranded in space
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
US Olympic track trials results: 400m hurdles stars dazzle as world record falls
Delaware lawmakers cap budget work with passage of record grants package for local organizations
How will Louisiana’s new Ten Commandments classroom requirement be funded and enforced?