Current:Home > MarketsPennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says -Capital Dream Guides
Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot dating rule is legal under civil rights law, appeals court says
View
Date:2025-04-13 02:08:57
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A requirement for Pennsylvania voters to put accurate handwritten dates on the outside envelopes of their mail-in ballots does not run afoul of a civil rights law, a federal appeals court panel said Wednesday, overturning a lower court ruling.
A divided 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to uphold enforcement of the required date on return envelopes, a technical mandate that caused thousands of votes to be declared invalid in the 2022 election.
The total number is a small fraction of the large state’s electorate, but the court’s ruling puts additional attention on Pennsylvania’s election procedures ahead of a presidential election in which its Electoral College votes are up for grabs.
A lower court judge had ruled in November that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if they are received in time. U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter said the envelope date is irrelevant in helping elections officials decide whether a ballot was received in time or if a voter is qualified.
In the court’s opinion, Judge Thomas Ambro said the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that the lower court relied upon does not pertain to ballot-casting rules broadly, such as dates on envelopes, but “is concerned only with the process of determining a voter’s eligibility to cast a ballot.”
“The Pennsylvania General Assembly has decided that mail-in voters must date the declaration on the return envelope of their ballot to make their vote effective,” Ambro wrote. “The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously held this ballot-casting rule is mandatory; thus, failure to comply renders a ballot invalid under Pennsylvania law.”
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which helped represent groups and voters who challenged the date mandate, said the ruling could mean thousands of votes won’t be counted over what it called a meaningless error.
“We strongly disagree with the panel majority’s conclusion that voters may be disenfranchised for a minor paperwork error like forgetting to write an irrelevant date on the return envelope of their mail ballot,” Ari Savitzky, a lawyer with the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project who argued the appeal, said in a statement. “We are considering all of our options at this time.”
State and national Republican groups defended the date requirement, and the Republican National Committee called the decision a “crucial victory for election integrity and voter confidence.”
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans under an expansion of mail-in ballots enacted in 2019.
veryGood! (394)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Kelly Osbourne Sends Love to Jamie Foxx as She Steps in For Him on Beat Shazam
- Joining Trend, NY Suspends Review of Oil Train Terminal Permit
- Florida Supreme Court reprimands judge for conduct during Parkland school shooting trial
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Man dies after eating raw oysters from seafood stand near St. Louis
- UN Climate Talks Stymied by Carbon Markets’ ‘Ghost from the Past’
- Newest doctors shun infectious diseases specialty
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- After a Rough Year, Farmers and Congress Are Talking About Climate Solutions
Ranking
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Popular COVID FAQs in 2022: Outdoor risks, boosters, 1-way masking, faint test lines
- Elon Musk Reveals New Twitter CEO: Meet Linda Yaccarino
- States Vowed to Uphold America’s Climate Pledge. Are They Succeeding?
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Fossil Fuel Production Emits More Methane Than Previously Thought, NOAA Says
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, June 11, 2023
- What’s at Stake for the Climate in the 2016 Election? Everything.
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
90 Day Fiancé: The Other Way Finale Sees Gabe Break Down in Tears During Wedding With Isabel
Below Deck’s Kate Chastain Response to Ben Robinson’s Engagement Will Put Some Wind in Your Sails
New York City mandates $18 minimum wage for food delivery workers
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Coping With Trauma Is Part of the Job For Many In The U.S. Intelligence Community
Why Adam Levine is Temporarily Returning to The Voice 4 Years After His Exit
Taylor Swift and Matty Healy Spotted Holding Hands Amid Dating Rumors